BOOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a net margin of 12.16% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 24.63%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.62% beat Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s return on equity of 40.98%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $237.14, signalling upside risk potential of 59.12%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $128.52 which suggests that it could grow by 26.45%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Deckers Outdoor Corp., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Deckers Outdoor Corp..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.754, which suggesting that the stock is 75.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor Corp. has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.216%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deckers Outdoor Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.6M, which are smaller than Deckers Outdoor Corp. quarterly revenues of $2B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $85.8M is lower than Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s net income of $481.1M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.06x while Deckers Outdoor Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.33x versus 2.90x for Deckers Outdoor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FIGS, Inc. has a net margin of 12.16% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 9.17%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.62% beat FIGS, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.54%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $237.14, signalling upside risk potential of 59.12%. On the other hand FIGS, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.31 which suggests that it could grow by 21.74%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than FIGS, Inc., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than FIGS, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.754, which suggesting that the stock is 75.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FIGS, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FIGS, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FIGS, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.6M, which are larger than FIGS, Inc. quarterly revenues of $201.9M. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $85.8M is higher than FIGS, Inc.'s net income of $18.5M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.06x while FIGS, Inc.'s PE ratio is 65.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.33x versus 3.43x for FIGS, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria's Secret & Co. has a net margin of 12.16% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.79%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.62% beat Victoria's Secret & Co.'s return on equity of 25.98%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $237.14, signalling upside risk potential of 59.12%. On the other hand Victoria's Secret & Co. has an analysts' consensus of $64.44 which suggests that it could grow by 33.54%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Victoria's Secret & Co., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Victoria's Secret & Co..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.754, which suggesting that the stock is 75.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria's Secret & Co. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria's Secret & Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria's Secret & Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.6M, which are smaller than Victoria's Secret & Co. quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $85.8M is lower than Victoria's Secret & Co.'s net income of $199.4M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.06x while Victoria's Secret & Co.'s PE ratio is 27.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.33x versus 0.63x for Victoria's Secret & Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has a net margin of 12.16% compared to Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 15.61%. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.62% beat Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s return on equity of 51.32%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $237.14, signalling upside risk potential of 59.12%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $204.53 which suggests that it could grow by 12%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, Inc., analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma, Inc..

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.754, which suggesting that the stock is 75.44% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.421%.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. pays out 29.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $705.6M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $85.8M is lower than Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s net income of $368M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.06x while Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. is 2.33x versus 2.92x for Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.